第1篇：课前演讲稿
Human beings are inherently biased about what they believe to be good due to individual tastes & backgrounds, but once one understands that a decidedly biased approach to what is true — is inherently dishonest, one can also understand how idealism and ideology have poorly served the quest for an honest, moral society.Both honesty and morality require that we base our opinions about what is good — upon unbiased ideas of what is TRUE — rather than vice versa(determining what is true based on what we feel is good)— the way all ideologies would have us believe.Because intentions are closely related to fairne and certainly affect the degree of honesty/dishonesty, there is a wide spread confusion about honesty--and a general belief that being dishonest means that one ALWAYS correctly understands if their behavior is either honest or dishonest.Self-perception of our morality is non-static and volatile.It's often at the moment we refuse to consider other perspectives that there is a clear indication we are not pursuing the truth, rather than simply and exclusively at the moment we can muster up evidence that we are right.Socrates had much to say about truth, honesty and morality, and explained that if people really understood that their behavior was wrong — then they simply wouldn't do it — by definition.Unfortunately, honesty in the western tradition has been marginalized to specific instances — perhaps because a thorough understanding of honesty collides with ideologies of all types.Ideologies and idealism often exaggerate and suppre evidence in order to support their perspectives — at the expense of the truth.This proce erodes the practice and understanding of honesty.To an ideologist the truth quite often becomes insignificant, what matters most are their ideals and what ever supports their desires to enjoy and spread those ideals.Human beings are inherently biased about what they believe to be good due to individual tastes & backgrounds, but once one understands that a decidedly biased approach to what is true — is inherently dishonest, one can also understand how idealism and ideology have poorly served the quest for an honest, moral society.Both honesty and morality require that we base our opinions about what is good — upon unbiased ideas of what is TRUE — rather than vice versa(determining what is true based on what we feel is good)— the way all ideologies would have us believe.
第2篇：课前演讲稿
human beings are inherently biased about what they believe to be good due to individual tastes & backgrounds, but once one understands that a decidedly biased approach to what is true — is inherently dishonest, one can also understand how idealism and ideology have poorly served the quest for an honest, moral society.both honesty and morality require that we base our opinions about what is good — upon unbiased ideas of what is true — rather than vice versa(determining what is true based on what we feel is good)— the way all ideologies would have us believe.because intentions are closely related to fairne and certainly affect the degree of honesty/dishonesty, there is a wide spread confusion about honesty--and a general belief that being dishonest means that one always correctly understands if their behavior is either honest or dishonest.self-perception of our morality is non-static and volatile.it's often at the moment we refuse to consider other perspectives that there is a clear indication we are not pursuing the truth, rather than simply and exclusively at the moment we can muster up evidence that we are right.socrates had much to say about truth, honesty and morality, and explained that if people really understood that their behavior was wrong — then they simply wouldn't do it — by definition.unfortunately, honesty in the western tradition has been marginalized to specific instances — perhaps because a thorough understanding of honesty collides with ideologies of all types.ideologies and idealism often exaggerate and suppre evidence in order to support their perspectives — at the expense of the truth.this proce erodes the practice and understanding of honesty.to an ideologist the truth quite often becomes insignificant, what matters most are their ideals and what ever supports their desires to enjoy and spread those ideals.human beings are inherently biased about what they believe to be good due to individual tastes & backgrounds, but once one understands that a decidedly biased approach to what is true — is inherently dishonest, one can also understand how idealism and ideology have poorly served the quest for an honest, moral society.both honesty and morality require that we base our opinions about what is good — upon unbiased ideas of what is true — rather than vice versa(determining what is true based on what we feel is good)— the way all ideologies would have us believe.
第3篇：课前演讲稿
课前演讲稿
演讲稿的写法比较灵活，可以根据会议的内容、一件事事后的感想、需要等情况而有所区别。在社会发展不断提速的今天，我们可以使用演讲稿的机会越来越多，为了让您在写演讲稿时更加简单方便，下面是小编为大家整理的课前演讲稿，希望能够帮助到大家。
课前演讲稿1
尊敬的XX：
我今天讲的名言是林清玄的一句话：“当我们寻找外在的精神之树时，也要种植内在的精神之树。”
这句话选自林清玄的散文集《清欢》里的《精神树》。我初看到这句话便喜欢上了它，并决定如果我讲名言一定要讲这句话。可是当我准备写演讲稿的时候，却发现很难，想了很久，才找到突破口，便是“精神”。
精神是个很抽象的名词，很难说清它是什么，但也能说它是什么。什么叫精神?勾践卧薪尝胆“三千越甲可吞吴”叫精神;邓稼先历时两年零八个月研制成两弹叫精神;奥斯特洛夫斯基
第4篇：课前演讲稿
读书之乐何处寻，数点梅花天地心。
——朱熹
与其埋怨，不如改变！越是泥泞的道路，留下的足迹越清晰；越是陡峭的山峰，看到的景致越美妙。世上没有平白无故的成功，所有的鲜花都是汗水浇灌而来。一旦选准自己要走的道路，就勇敢地走下去，再难也要坚持，再远也不要放弃。
亲爱的同学们老师们：大家好！
同学们，有生之年你们有没有那么一段时光觉得自己一度倒霉诸事不顺以至于内心忧困思虑？总会有那么些时候怨声载道的抱怨着：为什么倒霉的总是自己？报志愿的时候中考分数居然倒霉的只差理想高中一分，打个水能被烫成红猪蹄.全宿舍吃泡面，却只有自己被宿管抓到处分.这倒霉吗，是的可以说是非常倒霉了.但是我们只能苦苦埋怨吗，各种抱怨别人为什么总比自己幸运，总比自己过得好？自己那么倒霉，别人那么幸运，人生真不公平，不想活了.我想告诉大家的是，
