妨害公务罪论文:妨害公务罪客观方面之研究_浅论妨害公务罪

其他范文 时间:2020-02-26 23:31:04 收藏本文下载本文
【www.daodoc.com - 其他范文】

妨害公务罪论文:妨害公务罪客观方面之研究由刀豆文库小编整理,希望给你工作、学习、生活带来方便,猜你可能喜欢“浅论妨害公务罪”。

妨害公务罪论文:妨害公务罪客观方面之研究

【中文摘要】妨害公务罪在我国是一种常见的犯罪。由于我国正处于社会转型期,矛盾突出,妨害公务罪的案发数量也在不断上升中,这种趋势不利于我国和谐社会的构建和社会主义法治国家的建成。刑法第277条对妨害国家管理活动的违法行为进行了规定,但法条是通过1979年刑法划分修改而成,立法条文语句存在抽象简单等问题,导致在实践中难以形成统一规范的理解,运用中产生疑惑和混乱。学界对妨害公务罪现已经有部分探讨和理论,但不够深入细致,因此笔者特选此题进行研究,旨在从妨害公务罪的客观方面探讨本罪,完善现行刑法中对本罪的规定,以便解决司法疑难认定问题,规范统一实际操作。本文先阐述妨害公务罪的概念,具体阐明妨害公务行为的表现形式,包括暴力和威胁手段。本文对暴力与威胁的含义以及他们的限度如何理解进行深入分析;接着对“妨害行为”的对象进行研究,按照刑法第277条,妨害公务罪的行为对象严格意义上只有国家机关工作人员、全国人民代表大会和地方各级人民代表大会代表、红十字会工作人员这三类人员,笔者认为将范围扩大到受委托或法律、法规授权从事公务的人和中国共产党的各级机关,特定情况下居民委员会、村民委员会等群众性自治组织中的工作人员执行公务也可认为本罪的对象,还有与执行职务密切联系的物品和财产也被认作是妨害行为的对象。本文最后对行为如何认定,涉及执行行为的合法性认定问题,和适时性认定问题进行了细致分析和研究,文中结合典型案例评析,旨在给人留下深刻印象,更为清晰明确的论证观点。现行刑法中对妨害公务罪的规定虽然在一定时期内能符合司法实践的需求,但而今看来在很大程度上已经滞后于社会的现实需要。笔者进行上述研究期望用立法或解释的方式对妨害公务罪法条及内涵予以完善以确保刑法的社会功能。

【英文摘要】Crime of against Public affairs in China is one kind of common crime, because our country is being in the social transition period, and the contradiction is prominent.The number of the case had the tendency which day by day increased.This is not conducive to constructing our country harmonious society and completing the socialism country under the rule of law.The 277th of Criminal law make a stipulation to punish the illegal activity which hindered the country management activity, the law came by 1979’s Criminal law, and was made the division and change, because of the brief and abstract sentence of clause, which forms the unified regulations with difficulty the understanding in reality and lead to several difficulties and confusion, The educational world already had a part of discuion and the theory to this crime, but not thorough careful, therefore the author prefers the inferior topic to conduct the research, in order to discu this crime from objective aspect of the Crime of against Public affairs,consummate present criminal law to this crime’s stipulation, with the aim of solving the judicature to recognize the question difficultly, standard unification actual operation.This article elaborates the concept of the crime of against Public affairs first, elaborate the manifestation of concrete elaboration hindrance official busine behavior, including violence and threat method..The article thorough analysis violence and threat meaning and how to understand their limit, then research “hindrance behavior” object.According to criminal law 277th, The Crime of against Public affairs’behavior object only include the state personnel, the National People’s Congre and place all levels of the National People’s Congre represents, Red Cro staff these three kind of personnel in strict significance, the author thought that range extension to the person who is entrusted and Communist Party of China’s all levels of institutions or the laws and regulations authorization are engaged in official busine, In the particular case ma autonomous organization’s and so on in the Residents’ committee, villagers committee staff performances of official functions may also regarded as this crime’s object.The goods and the property with carried out duty close contacting also to recognize as the object hindering

the behavior.Finally this article carried the careful analysis and the research on how to recognize to the behavior that involves the question that carries out the behavior validity and the question with the timeline.In the article unifies the illustrative case evaluation, is for the purpose of making the deep impreion to the human, clearer explicit proof viewpoint.In the present, criminal law to hinders official busine crime’s stipulation, although meets the judicial practice demand in certain time internal energy, At the present looks like already lagged to a great extent in society’s realistic need.The author carries on the above research expectation to consummate the hinders official busine crime law and the connotation with legislative or the explanation way, in order to guarantee the social function of the criminal law.【关键词】妨害公务罪 公务行为 客观方面 暴力 威胁 公务的合法性

【英文关键词】crime of against Public affairs objective aspect violence threat legitimacy of behavior 【目录】妨害公务罪客观方面之研究3-4述8-9ABSTRACT4-

5引言7-8

摘要

一、妨害公务罪的概

(一)对暴力

二、妨害公务行为的表现方式9-2

4之理解9-16的上下限13-15对威胁手段的分析16-18

1.暴力的概念及分类9-132.暴力方法

(二)3.超过强度上限后的处理15-1616-19

1.威胁手段的特征表现2.威胁的程度18-19(三)“妨害行为”的对象之分析19-2424-

32三、执行公务行为认定之分析

24-29

1.依法执行职(一)公务行为的合法性务中的法的范围24-2525-27

2.公务行为合法的标准

(二)公务

参3.判断职务行为合法的主体27-29

结语32-33行为的适时性29-32考文献34-36

致谢33-34

攻读学位期间的研究成果36

妨害公务罪

妨害公务罪上传时间:2011-12-29 [释义] 妨害公务罪,是指以暴力、威胁的方法,阻碍国家工作人员、人民代表及在一定条件下的红十字会工作人员依法执行职务或履行职责,或者以暴力、......

妨害公务罪

妨害公务罪 妨害公务罪是指以暴力、威胁方法阻碍国家机关工作人员、人大代表依法执行职务,或者在自然灾害中和突发事件中,使用暴力、威胁方法阻碍红十字会工作人员依法履行职......

妨害公务罪侵害对象之认定

妨害公务罪,是指以暴力、威胁的方法,阻碍国家机关工作人员、人大代表、红十字会工作人员依法执行职务、履行职责的行为,或者故意阻碍~机关、公安机关依法执行~工作任务,造成严重后......

妨害公务罪的刑法解释(整理)

妨害公务罪的刑法解释第二百七十七条 以暴力、威胁方法阻碍国家机关工作人员依法执行职务的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役、管制或者罚金。以暴力、威胁方法阻碍全国人民代表大......

司法实践中如何正确认定妨害公务罪

来源:重庆智豪律师事务所编辑:张智勇律师(重庆市律师协会刑事委员会副主任)刑事知名律师张智勇释义司法实践中如何正确认定妨害公务罪司法实践中如何正确认定妨害公务罪一.本罪......

下载妨害公务罪论文:妨害公务罪客观方面之研究word格式文档
下载妨害公务罪论文:妨害公务罪客观方面之研究.doc
将本文档下载到自己电脑,方便修改和收藏。
点此处下载文档

文档为doc格式

热门文章
点击下载本文